Le Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 06:32:05PM +0100, Olivier Sallou a écrit : > > I could also create (sub)binary packages with package name libbioseq > and libbioali, but I don't think it is acceptable to use several > packages names (not like squizz-xxx). My control file would have > source package squizz and binary packages squizz, libbioali, > libbioseq
Hi Olivier, I think that as long as no other package depend on the bioali and bioseq libraries, the current situation is sufficient. I had a look and added a symbols so that the dependancy on libsquizz goes through the shlibs:Depends substitution variable. Unfortunately, I also found a non-free file. I think that our archive administrators enforce the same policy for software code and for data. Therefore, you have the choice between: - Delete the non-free file and disable the regression test(s) where it is used. - Upload the package to the non-free section of the Debian archive, instead of Debian proper. - Discuss with Upstream so that he finds a free replacement. By the way, perhaps you can also report Upstream that the man pages that he installs in the man5 directory still have ‘1’ as a section in their .TH line. Correcting this would simplify their installation. Also, I see that you wrote a manpage for squizz, but there is one from upstream as well, that you might have overlooked. Have a nice week-end, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
