On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:27:28PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I do not see much of a burden to have the package in non-free. For instance,
> seaview was moved to non-free after it incorporated a small part of Phylip,
> and
> nobody complained about this.
Hey, I complained (perhaps in PM). I would really love to see seaview
back in main.
> Perhaps we could have a med-non-free meta package in non-free ?
It would have to be builded manually (+ separately from other
metapackages) because the (current) metapackage building code verifies
if a package is in main.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
