Sounds good to me. Hierarchical tags don't make much sense. Thanks -Dominique
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Charles Plessy <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > we have hundred of packages, and making sure that they are all > comprehensively > tagged takes time. > > As discussed earlier, the Debtags are not a hierarchical structure, that > is, > field::biology:bioinformatics is not a child of field::biology. > > http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > > In that sense, specialised tags are unnecessary complications unless they > have > a direct use. In our case, we have metapackages to guide our users to > bioinformatics packages. > > Since we have a works-with::biological-sequence, I think I will start to go > ahead and replace field::biology:bioinformatics by > works-with::biological-sequence. > > Similarly, I am not using anymore the biology:: facet, that was created as > a > compromise at a moment where I did not understand Debtags well, and > propose to > delete them unless somebody uses them. > > Is everybody fine with this ? > > Have a nice day, > > -- > Charles Plessy > Debian Med packaging team, > http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med > Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [email protected] > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > >
