> Thanks, both fixed. No problem >> this way you will conveniently get all free medical software which is >> available for Debian by simply installing the relevant metapackage >> this way you will get free medical software available for Debian >> by installing the relevant metapackage. > > I do not see a reason why you like to drop 'conveniently' and 'all'.
Euh, shorten the sentence (but that's just a proposition...). I think this is sufficent for user to understand the content of the metapackage... >> Noticed your wish to improve the package descriptions. >> Do you want me to discuss modifications here or should I directly >> change the description from the SVN (for the Debian Med tasks and >> packages - not for packaged projects)? I believe some of you are >> addict to the svn commit list :D... But sometimes, discussion around >> description can improve future developments... > > In principle SVN commit would be fine because I'm watching these. > However, in these rather user trageting things like the descriptions it > might make sense to post it here (in `svn diff` format perhaps). Ok (but only when I have svn/my computer under my hand - holidays soon). Eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caj_xb5dcao_e7g68mzjporw5vjept0_mzpziczdrsfn7btg...@mail.gmail.com
