On Thursday, July 26, 2012 02:55:26 PM Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:53:46PM +0200, Sebastian Hilbert wrote: > > I was under the impression that I prepared both server and client. > > No, only client was updated. If you would confirm I just need to increase > the version number I'll go on upload. >
svn indicates I worked on the control file six weeks ago. Apparently I forgot to update the changelog The version for experimental would be 17.1. Diff says all I did was add myself to the changelog (yeah) :-) > > However I > > did not explicetly prepare 1.2.1 but rather 1.2.0. There are no > > differences > > with regards to the rules file or config files however so I guess just > > changing the version would do it ? > > Just uploaded. With regards to 1.2.1 I just noticed that that I made a mistake in the rules file by forgetting to change the <suggests> to server version 17. It still suggests v16 for the 1.1 clients. > > > I assume that when a package is built on the Debian servers the sources > > are > > downloaded fresh anyway from upstream ? > > This assumption is wrong. There is no such process that automatically > fetches new upstream source. The Debian maintainer gets a notification > from uscan about new upstream versions and will download this, increase > the changelog entry (a changelog entry that does not match the source > tarball will not build) and than the package will be pushed to the > Debian servers. Debian servers have *never* automatically fetched any > upstream sources and I guess this will also never happen in the future. > I see. In summary gnumed-server 17.1 can be uploaded. In one of the next bug fix releases suggests should be changed as noted above. Will now go in and try to commit a fix. Thanks for your help. Sebastian
