On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 08:22:37PM +0200, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> > There is some longish discussion on debian-devel list (I think in August
> > archive) why this is actually important.
> >
>
> This is not leading anywhere. Let me know which of the following options
> would
> waste the least amount of everyone's time.
>
> 1.) I will provide locations to the files in the foswiki svn but I will not
> check (and verify) which tool (with whatever obscure parameter) is used to
> get
> from the file in svn to the file in the tarball. IOW I will not dissect their
> build script.
I have seen in some Makefiles of FosWiki that most probably
yui-compressor
is used. I think we could safely assume that if the conversion of what
is available in the Wiki looks "quite similar" to what is delivered in the
GNUmed tarball this is OK.
> I am grateful for your attempts to solve this (including checking licenses)
> but I am not willing to spend time on checking what upstream does.
>
> Since those files are FOSS licensed we could even go as far as including them
> into the GNUmed tarball and pretend those were ours.
I'd say it makes no sense to spend time in discussing it in a parallel
thread to debian-devel. I personally tend to agree with your arguing
but the contrary opinion has some perfectly valid arguments and we
finally need to close what the release team considers a RC bug.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
