Hi Andreas,

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Jorge,
>
> snp-sites looks quite good now.


:)
Hooray!
Thank you for the feedback and thank you for guiding me through all this.


>  I have one remaining lintian warning:
>
>   W: snp-sites source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.3 (current is
> 3.9.5)
>
> which is probably hidden from your sight if you do not use the latest
> lintian
> from Debian unstable.


That's correct.
I am only building against a Sid base package. My own environment is
actually wheezy.
I did this simply because Sid was a bit unreliable running as a VM in
VirtualBox (I have a macintosh machine where I run my Debian VM).


>  Since I'm usually fixing this via
>
>     cme fix dpkg-control
>
> (see Debian Med policy!!) this did some shuffling around with the
> d/control file.


I will have to read all of it prior to the meet up.


>  Since in most cases it is sensible to normalise
> d/control file I just commited this.


That's fine and great!
Thank you.


>  Just to explain the partly heavily
> looking diff which is simply based on some reordering (but that way we
> get the order in all our packages equally).
>
> Definitely fine.


> I also removed the explicit dependency from zlib - this is injected
> automatically via ${shlibs:Depends} where needed and there is no point
> in adding libs manually.
>
>
I see. I didn't know this.


> --> git pull
>
> Now we have some remaining lintian informations (lintian -I) I would
> like you to fix.  It says:
>
> I: snp-sites source: duplicate-long-description libsnp-sites1
> libsnp-sites1-dev snp-sites
> I: libsnp-sites1: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
> I: snp-sites: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
> I: libsnp-sites1-dev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
>
>
> Yes, in fact the description is a bit too short and the lib* packages
> are also not "This program".  Could you please be a bit more verbose in
> the long description?  I think once this is done the package is ready
> for upload.
>
>
I'm on it.

And I'm really happy to be so close.

Thanks for your work on this
>
>
Thank you.
It's a lot of pleasurable work.
And now that I'm almost done with this package, the next ones will be
easier to do... hopefully!

Kindest regards,

Jorge

Reply via email to