Hi Amul, On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:25:22AM -0400, Amul Shah wrote: > Hi Andreas, > Thanks to your prior instructions and V6.2-000 changes eliminating the patch > series, going through this round was a quite quick.
:-) > I added two lintian warnings overrides. Please let me know if they are > correct. Lintian was able to use the crated overrides - so this is obviously fine. I just fixed W: fis-gtm-6.2-000: debian-changelog-line-too-long line 6 (git pull) - please note that the target distribution should be "UNRELEASED" until we will release. I also wonder whether you could forward the "spelling-error-in-binary" type lintian infos to upstream. > While looking at the installed directory, I noticed two inconsistencies > marked as (todo) in the changelog. Both entries are related to the encryption > plugins. We build only one plugin (using libgcrypt and AES256CFB) and the > "plugin" directory is a symlink in the utf8 directory (which IIRC does not > match what our install script produces). So do you plan to fix this before I'll upload? Please tell me once you are happy with the package since I personally know to less about fis-gtm to know whether these todos are blocking issues or not. > On a loosely related note, I learned how to avoid signing the packages > without my GPG key > (http://notes.timeghost.net/2009/12/build-a-binary-deb-package-without-signing.html). > You may recall this was my stumbling block for V6.0-003. > git-buildpackage --git-builder="debuild -i -us -uc" Yup - I should have mentioned this, sorry. Kind regards and thanks for your work on this Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
