Andreas, please hold off on the upload till the discussion between Thorsten and me runs its course. Thank you.
My preference is to keep the package with "openssl" in the names of the symbolic links, since V6.2-000 just continues what V6.1-000 did in the reference implementation of the plugin being able to request cryptographic computations from OpenSSL for services (as did V6.0-003 before V6.1-000), and no one previously raised any questions about it. Otherwise, we will address it with a note in the README. Regards -- Bhaskar On 10/04/2014 07:24 PM, Amul Shah wrote: > Hi Andreas, >>> [amul:4] V6.2-000 is ready for upload! >> And so I did. Thanks for your work on this > [amul:7] While we wait for the apparent licensing conflict to resolve (I > don't understand how dynamically linking a library causes problems, but I'm > no lawyer ;), I went ahead and updated the CMakelists.txt patch to not build > the encryption plugins that leverage OpenSSL. I also eliminated the final > lintian warnings. I'll ensure those changes reach upstream. > > [amul:7] We are once again ready for upload! > > thanks, Amul > > -- GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises. _____________ The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
