Hi Gert,
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:21:07PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> > I admit I somehow regret that I had the following GSoC idea to late:
> >
> > Provide test suites for all Debian Med packages
> >
> > I think this makes a great GSoC project - we should remember this for
> > next year.
> +1
:-)
> One option to provide some tests in this case could be based on publicly
> available data, e.g. from [1]: Create results with the old version of
> the software and test the new version against these results. This should
> not be too difficult, but the selection of the data should be done by
> someone who actually knows about this gene sequencing stuff in order to
> obtain a test set that covers a wide variety of possible inputs.
... and this someone is neither you or me. :-)
So if you (=as the reader of this list) always wanted to know how to help
this is your chance to contribute.
> > I guess the code copy of the old seqan will show several C++ problems as
> > well. So IMHO trying to work with this is similarly fruitless as trying
> > to port the code to new seqan.
> Usually solving these errors is quite straightforward, so if you think
> that for know it would make sense to include the old code, I could do
> the porting to the new C++ compiler, and then, when we have a test set
> we could focus on moving to the new seqan.
I'd prefer to wait whether there is somebody volunteering to adapt
straight to the new seqan.
Kind regards
Andreas.
> [1] http://www.gigasciencejournal.com/
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150415102841.gd...@an3as.eu
