On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:57:43AM +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> > Debian Science team. In other words: While you stated that what we
> > need is probably a different code base than we need for fastqc the
> > package might need some love independently.
> I may package it independently but how should we do that ? It would in a
> way conflict with "official" hdf5 lib. How should we name /describe it ?
> Or should it be a kinda libjava-fastq-hdf5 package ?
I do not think that fastqc is the important point but may be
libjava-hdf5-ethz
since it was developed at ethz. Does this sound logical?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
