On 05/14/2015 06:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:57:43AM +0200, [email protected] wrote: >>> Debian Science team. In other words: While you stated that what we >>> need is probably a different code base than we need for fastqc the >>> package might need some love independently. >> I may package it independently but how should we do that ? It would in a >> way conflict with "official" hdf5 lib. How should we name /describe it ? >> Or should it be a kinda libjava-fastq-hdf5 package ? > I do not think that fastqc is the important point but may be > > libjava-hdf5-ethz > > since it was developed at ethz. Does this sound logical? Sounds logical.
I will have a look but it will certainly require quite a lot of time. I had a look at library source code and it requires other libs (from some source) that should be packaged too, plus C stuff to compile (java calls native C). so it will be I think a complex package. Olivier > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > -- gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
