Hi Andreas, On 7/4/18 9:54 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Steffen, > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:15:17AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: >> It happened that I was reading a review on software that is about what >> omegaMap is about if I am not erroneous. The authors did not reference >> omegaMap, but compared the Open Source tools SweeD, SweepFinder, >> SweepFinder2, and OmegaPlus: >> >> https://jbiolres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40709-017-0064-0?&utm_medium=other&utm_source=other&utm_content=4172018&utm_campaign=10_dann_ctw2018_1_bio_03 >> >> (Open Access) >> >> I liked the name SweeD and it is from a place that once had summoned one >> of their researchers to a Debian Med Sprint, so I spontaneously decided >> to package it at https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/sweed. Comments welcome. > Thanks for packaging this. I had some changes in Git (including > changing the tarball to clean it up completely). Since I have not yet > seen any upload I took the freedom to push the fixes - please delete > your local tags and pull. I do not plan further changes. Excellent. I wished the authors of such review papers would talk to us so we could have packages in our distribution for the software they positively evaluated. > BTW, for everybody who intends to start with a new package: Please > write debian/watch and Files-Excluded in d/copyright first and use it to > obtain the upstream tarball. You save manual work and the way to obtain > the doc is perfectly documented. May be I should hereby send another > advertising for the package template I'm using: > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/community/package_template
I admittedly had not looked at this for ages. It is nice. The watch file in particular. Have you talked back to the dh_make people about it? Best, Steffen
