Hello, I don't understand that search string, can't make up what exactly was searched on.
On the first ten results only this explicitly mentions v4: https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article/9/2/giaa009/5734639 extra link: https://bioconda.github.io/recipes/mummer4/README.html Nice Day, On 10-04-20 12:52, James Procter wrote: > > Hi All > > On 10/04/2020 11:31, Andreas Tille wrote: >> I can not comment on Ben's research. Is there any bioinformatician who >> could clarify what version of MUMmer should be sensibly packaged? > > Maybe: as a general guide you should at least provide an equivalent of > the most recent bioconda package: > > https://bioconda.github.io/recipes/mummer/README.html > > A quick literature search for citations to Mummer's canonical > publication > https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_ylo=2020&hl=en&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&cites=15093378899564891093&scipsc= > suggested most researchers are using 3.23. > > Watching the bioconda forum for updates is also useful to work out if > there are significant improvements upstream. > > Jim. > > PS. Keep up the amazing work - all my time is taken up wrangling > Jalview right now but I'll continue to monitor emails (at least) and > delurk when I can contribute... > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dr JB Procter, Jalview Coordinator, The Barton Group > Division of Computational Biology, School of Life Sciences > University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK. > +44 1382 388734 | www.jalview.org | www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk > > > The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
