Hi, This is just a follow-up request for sponsorship for king-probe.
As pointed out by FTPmaster, reference files weren't actually necessary for comparison. Besides, they can bloat the package and result in copyright issues too. So I have removed them and added their md5 hashes for comparison. Please review and sponsor. https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/king-probe Regards, Pranav On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:53 PM Pranav Ballaney <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I've added autopkgtests to king-probe [1], along with some information > about their sources in debian/README.test. > I've also listed them in d/copyright but I don't know which license to use > for PDB files that I've used as input data. > > According to the wwPDB Usage Policy [2], > "Data files contained in the PDB archive (ftp://ftp.wwpdb.org) are free > of all copyright restrictions and made fully and freely available for both > non-commercial and commercial use. Users of the data should attribute the > original authors of that structural data." > > So if I attribute the original authors of the publication, which license > do I use? > > For the files used as references to run tests, I've attributed the > copyright to myself and released the files under the same license as the > package itself. > Please review my changes and specially take a look at d/README.test and > d/copyright and let me know what I should change there. > > [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/king-probe > [2]: https://www.wwpdb.org/about/privacy > > Regards, > Pranav > ᐧ > ᐧ
