Uploaded. Thanks a lot for your work on this, Andreas. On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:26:14PM +0530, Pranav Ballaney wrote: > Hi, > > This is just a follow-up request for sponsorship for king-probe. > > As pointed out by FTPmaster, reference files weren't actually necessary for > comparison. Besides, they can bloat the package and result in copyright > issues too. So I have removed them and added their md5 hashes for > comparison. > > Please review and sponsor. > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/king-probe > > Regards, > Pranav > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:53 PM Pranav Ballaney <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've added autopkgtests to king-probe [1], along with some information > > about their sources in debian/README.test. > > I've also listed them in d/copyright but I don't know which license to use > > for PDB files that I've used as input data. > > > > According to the wwPDB Usage Policy [2], > > "Data files contained in the PDB archive (ftp://ftp.wwpdb.org) are free > > of all copyright restrictions and made fully and freely available for both > > non-commercial and commercial use. Users of the data should attribute the > > original authors of that structural data." > > > > So if I attribute the original authors of the publication, which license > > do I use? > > > > For the files used as references to run tests, I've attributed the > > copyright to myself and released the files under the same license as the > > package itself. > > Please review my changes and specially take a look at d/README.test and > > d/copyright and let me know what I should change there. > > > > [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/king-probe > > [2]: https://www.wwpdb.org/about/privacy > > > > Regards, > > Pranav > > ᐧ > > > ᐧ
-- http://fam-tille.de
