* Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011218 09:03]: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 02:57:52PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: > > Takuo asked me what to do, so he doesn't know. He's the maintainer. I > > have recently had interactions with Takuo over other items as well, > > especially as it relates to debian-qa. I think you are jumping to > > premature conclusions because you are not yet familiar enough with the > > full situation to understand. > > If you want to get stuff into testing then helping fix bugs in it or its > dependancies is probably a better bet than filing bugs on the package > requesting that it get moved into testing.
Thank you very much Mark. I would love to help, however I lack the skills to do so. I also do not see why Scott was so angry even after reading the (useful) link he gave me. He hasn't replied to the email I sent to him directly. >From the email I got from Takuo I have to believe he needs help in this process as well. I am learning, but it is a big learning curve to package maintainer guruhood. That's why I am subscribed to this list. I am doing my best to do my homework to get up to speed. Pointers are appreciated when I am obviously missing some information. Profanity is not appreciated. So, back to the issue at hand. The update_excuses looks like this: * evolution/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: libgnome-pilot1 (>= 0.1.63) ['gnome-pilot'] * out of date on arm: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 0.99.2-1) * evolution/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libgnome-pilot1 (>= 0.1.63) ['gnome-pilot'] * out of date on ia64: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 0.99.0-2) * out of date on m68k: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 0.15-3) * out of date on mips: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 0.99.0-2) * out of date on mipsel: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 0.99.2-1) * out of date on powerpc: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 0.99.2-1) * out of date on s390: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 0.99.2-1) * out of date on sparc: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 0.99.0-2) * Not considered * Depends: evolution gnome-pilot Would fixing libgnome-pilot1 or changing this to a recommend instead of depend allow evolution to move into woody? MUST all platforms be fixed simultaneously? Thank you in advance, -- -- Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
