Hi, I migrated the Debian packaging of tifffile from SVN to Git[1]. After upgrading to the latest upstream version (dated 2017-09-14) I get:
... x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/tifffile-20170914=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -I/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/core/include -I/usr/include/python2.7 -c tifffile.c -o build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.7/tifffile.o tifffile.c:575:1: warning: return type defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int] py_decodelzw(PyObject* obj, PyObject* args) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ tifffile.c: In function 'py_decodelzw': tifffile.c:590:16: warning: return makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] return NULL; ^~~~ tifffile.c:634:9: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'if' if (code == 257) break; /* end of information */ ^~ tifffile.c:645:32: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token do { GET_NEXT_CODE } while (code == 256); ^ tifffile.c:648:11: error: expected 'while' before 'else' } else { ^~~~ tifffile.c:704:9: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'if' if (code == 257) break; /* end of information */ ^~ tifffile.c:713:32: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token do { GET_NEXT_CODE } while (code == 256); ^ ... It seems that the definition of GET_NEXT_CODE is just wrong - but what would be correct? Any help is welcome Andreas. [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-med/tifffile.git -- http://fam-tille.de