On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 12:34:24AM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > Am 14.07.22 um 23:30 schrieb Vladimir Oltean: > > > frer/*.sh are BSD-3-clause licensed. Please add the license to > > > d/copyright. > > > > Interestingly, frer/*.sh are not intended to be distributed by the > > Debian package. The repository grew from a bunch of shell scripts to > > being dominated by a C program which largely incorporated what used to > > be written in bash and python, and what's in the "frer" folder is what's > > left of that. However these are not of interest to the Debian audience. > > I think that the debian package only needs to state the copyright of > > files that actually contribute to the software being distributed, > > case in which I don't need to add BSD as a license, am I right? > > From a legal perspective that would be okay. But the Debian Policy requires > that > all distribution licenses of the source package are included in d/copyright, > no > matter if they are included in the binary package. > > The alternative is excluding the files from the origtargz but that should not > be > done in this case. > > > > While you might be the author of all the NXP copyrighted files, the file > > > headers say "Copyright 2019-2021 NXP". > > > We are more interested in Copyright statements than authorship because > > > that is what some licenses require to reproduce. > > > > > > Please untag moreinfo from this bug when you have changed the copyright > > > file accordingly. > > > > Ok, so the change I need to make is > > s/2019-2021 Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>/2019-2021 NXP/, > > right? > > Exactly.
Updated the salsa git repository, reuploaded to mentors and removed the moreinfo tag, thanks.
