Am 28.07.22 um 16:49 schrieb Scorpion2185:
I see "multi-timer (0.2.0-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium" in the changelog, what
version should I use instead?
The upstream version is 0.2.0.
Mentor's warning wanted me to use a -x.x format.
You have to use 0.2.0-1, as I have already pointed out in my previous email
(Debian revision has to be -1).
The lintian warning about the NMU was because of the "" around realroot.
I removed the "".
Fine, so now lintian generates a maintainer-upload-has-incorrect-version-number
because of the -0.1 revision.
I updated the watch file. Is it correct now?
Nope. Please read man uscan.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
------- Original Message -------
On Wednesday, July 27th, 2022 at 8:18 PM, Bastian Germann
<[email protected]> wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Wed, 18 May 2022 14:34:23 +0200 Bastian Germann [email protected] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:57:13 +0000 Scorpion2185 [email protected] wrote:
I updated the files again, no lintian errors.
There is warning about man page, the author changed the name of the bin the man
page is there.
There is still 1 lintian error:
debian-rules-is-dh_make-template
...and several warnings:
source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number (Please use the same name/email in
changelog and Maintainer)
d/changelog:
There is also the problem of a bad Debian revision. This has to be -1 for an
initial package version.
Please also remove the ”” around realroot.
syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright
For me, the following lintian information is also a blocker:
debian-watch-file-is-missing
The provided watch file does not work because there are no git tags.
