> The rules for this in Debian are "if the license matches the DFSG requirements this can go into main". Other things you mentioned aren't really important.
> "who has not licensed [...] the code" means the default restrictions apply, which is "fair use only". Great, thanks for the explanation. > If by "The statement of the software being free" you meant "The design system is freely available to all and can be downloaded" written on this page then no > it's not even a statement of the software being "free". Software that can be downloaded and used without payment is often called "freeware". So in this case, where "fair use only" exists (and no explicit compliant licence has been stated and its not clear whether the software "in the public domain"), its not OK to package it seems (unless I misread the Guidlelines) (https://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines) ... Thanks for the response
