Adam P. Harris wrote: > Joey Hess, as the maintainer of debhelper, do you see this as a > situation that should change? I think we should eliminate any manuals > suggesting debstd (or put it under a "historic" section), and try to > get someone working on a debhelper equivalent. Perhaps a discussion > of the pros and cons of debhelper, hand-roll (a la Manoj), and > cvs-buildpackage and the like could be discussed also.
I certianly have no problwm with documents directing new maintainers to debhelper. I think a discussion of other options would be good too. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

