-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On 6 Jul 1998, Adam P. Harris wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > debstd is depricated, use the debhelper instead. > > [...] which ones are deprecated and which are supported, [...] Interesting. Is deprecated the opposite of supported? What does "supported" exactly mean? You can still submit bugs against debmake, and if the fix is obvious, they will be fixed. BTW: Is un-debhelper-izing a package as easy as un-debstd-izing it? How many lines do you have to change to un-debhelper-ize a debhelper-ized package? And how many to un-debstd-ize a debstd-ized package? If we are going to "deprecate" things, why don't we just deprecate all package building tools at the same time? BTW2: What happened with the package building tool Ian Jackson was going to write, which required no run-time module? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNaEljyqK7IlOjMLFAQFuRgP/c8KjPlCn43kQW1FZiHB7nEztrQfZWQ+h fDMag3T/3kpXB7lKq/w7L7xNPaftzoc+PJ63dU0qlESJym+s+s9Xnb8u3rBKNCzo PFfOJsf1wLFft+ERBbryxD14g5nwrt825qEoMDfTw14Emfr5TwOyLtQFQ1kzcacc v6/MxoNMHsc= =zxn9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
