iirc this exact situation was discussed rather recently with some other package, and the result was that there is one /main source archive. The division to '/us' and /non-us is not important, especially now when apt can hide it from the user.
This would imply one source in /non-us and two binaries. Can't remember exact time or the package in question, however. Still it might be useful to browse through archive to see if anything turns up. t.aa Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri Nov 12, 1999 8:03 PM > The latest upstream version of powstatd comes in two favours, > regular and one that use 128-bit TEA encryption for communication > between master and slave. > > Currently, the upstream author is producing two source archives > (but we are discussing this). The only difference is that one > doesn't include xtea.c and the other one does. I planned to have > my regular `powstatd' package supplemented by a new > `powstatd-crypt' package. > > Do I have to make two source packages? > > Or can I upload everything to non-us and produce two binary > packages (one for regular main and the other for non-us/main)? > I have the feeling this is not allowed because it makes the > source hard to find. Right? > > The irony is that xtea.c is freely available outside the US, does > not originate from the US, and has only _32_ lines of code!
