[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > iirc this exact situation was discussed rather recently with > some other package, and the result was that there is one /main > source archive. The division to '/us' and /non-us is not > important, especially now when apt can hide it from the user. > > This would imply one source in /non-us and two binaries. > > Can't remember exact time or the package in question, however. > Still it might be useful to browse through archive to see > if anything turns up.
I'm trying to find this discussion and not succeeding. Was it on -mentors? I grepped for non-us in recent archives of -devel, -legal and -mentors and didn't see anything like that. Thanks for any additional pointers (anything you can remember). Peter > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri Nov 12, 1999 8:03 PM > > The latest upstream version of powstatd comes in two favours, > > regular and one that use 128-bit TEA encryption for communication > > between master and slave. > > > > Currently, the upstream author is producing two source archives > > (but we are discussing this). The only difference is that one > > doesn't include xtea.c and the other one does. I planned to have > > my regular `powstatd' package supplemented by a new > > `powstatd-crypt' package. > > > > Do I have to make two source packages? > > > > Or can I upload everything to non-us and produce two binary > > packages (one for regular main and the other for non-us/main)? > > I have the feeling this is not allowed because it makes the > > source hard to find. Right? > > > > The irony is that xtea.c is freely available outside the US, does > > not originate from the US, and has only _32_ lines of code!
