martin f krafft wrote: > no, and it would be horrible because there's no intuitive difference > between jack and JACK that can relate to the difference between the > two pieces of software. a package name is supposed to give a real > clue, and i wouldn't know what the difference between jack and JACK > are...
Ok, I already thought so, just wanted to be sure... > why not name it jackit since that's apparently the project name on > sourceforge? This is my current way to do it. It's only the 2nd best alternative for the upstream author, who would prefer jack-audio-connection-kit. A bit long, I think... JACK in uppercase latters was another proposal from another guy on the jackit-devel mailing list. regards, -- Wanna listen to my music? <------ ----> http://www.shockfrosted.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
