Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > > The upstream prefers it jack-audio-connection-kit.
> > Maybe that would be a good name. > A bit longish. As a user, I don't have much problem with such a name > (apart from "dpkg -l"), but I wouldn't want to maintain such a beast. > I am annoyed enough with my "freenet-unstable" as it is. Hmm, I would also prefer a short name like jackit, just because it's short :-) But what are in your opinion the disadvantages in maintaining a package with such a long name? regards, Stefan -- Wanna listen to my music? <------ ----> http://www.shockfrosted.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
