On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 10:36:39AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > On 12-Sep-2005, Carlos Parra Camargo wrote: > > > > plans lets you put calendars on the web, is free and has great features: > > > Can you comment on the differences/advantages/disadvantages of > > > plans vs. webcalendar? This would be a useful thing to include in > > > the description, too. > > > > IMO, the description should be about the application, it shouldn't > > be a comparative. Actually, devref 6.2.3 [0] says:
| The following paragraphs should answer the following questions: Why do | I as a user need this package? What other features does the package | have? What outstanding features and deficiencies are there compared to | other packages (e.g., "if you need X, use Y instead")? Is this package | related to other packages in some way that is not handled by the | package manager (e.g., "this is the client for the foo server")? | | [...] | | How is this package different from the competition? Is it a better | implementation? more features? different features? Why should I choose | this package. > > Anyway, 'plans' is enough good to be uploaded into debian. > > Please write a description that convinces a curious and/or skeptical > user, already familiar with other web calendar applications (though > not necessarily any specific one). Agree here. Justin References [0] http://www.us.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
