-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tommaso Moroni wrote: > The knights package uses dpatch to correct some mistakes in po/de.po, > thus generating a po/de.gmo which is different from the upstream source. > While this doesn't affect the package build, a second build fails because of > unrepresentable change to po/de.gmo. > > Should a package be rebuildable consecutive multiple times?
Yes. I'd suggest removing generated files in clean target. Either in debian/rules or in Makefile (or Makefile.in, if used). It would be perfect if upstream tarball didn't contain any generated .gmo files and removes them in Makefile(.in). Consider discussing this with upstream author(s). hth, dam - -- Damyan Ivanov Creditreform Bulgaria [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.creditreform.bg/ phone: +359(2)928-2611, 929-3993 fax: +359(2)920-0994 mob. +359(88)856-6067 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gaim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDULJ1Hqjlqpcl9jsRAqK7AJ0Xz3Wmw1sGhwKqAzb/xcs1HNV5rACdFKrT Ckl3BB/Ai8k3qY05soR8vZo= =eli1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
