On Friday 14 July 2006 10:08, Bas Wijnen wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:34:20AM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > > > > shc (3.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low > > > > > > ^^^^^^^ > > > > > > This is the wrong version number for an NMU anyway. > > > > True. Fixed as -0.1. Hm, it would be nice if lintian and linda warn if > > changelog claims Non-maintainer upload and the debian-revision value is > > not compliant with the conventions > > They do. However, since you added yourself as comaintainer (via > Uploaders:), they didn't actually consider it an NMU.
That also should be catched and warned, since an NMU done by a maintaner makes no sense. > They could check > that non-NMU uploads must not say "Non maintainer upload" in the changelog. > Appearantly they don't do that. I think a wishlist bug is in order there. Well, it makes no difference which case you have. Anyways if you have a conflicting declarations for debian-revision value and /Non-maintainer upload/i as first changelog entry, lintian&linda should warn about. In fact I can see such an attempt in /usr/share/lintian/checks/nmu but it doesn't work as expected or at least for me. I'll try to investigate that further. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
