Christoph Haas wrote: > On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: > >> Christoph Haas wrote: >> >>> On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: >>> >>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "museek+". >>>> >>> I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from >>> http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/museek-plus/museek+-0.1.1 >>> 1.tar.bz2 differs in several places from the orig.tar.gz that you >>> provide. >>> >> I took one or two revision from svn that fixes license issues.... >> Do you want me to apply them through dpatch ? >> > > Yes please. Otherwise it's hard to understand what you patched and why. If > you really need to package a CVS/SVN version instead of the upstream's > last stable release then consider using an upstream version > like "0.99.4+cvs20060813". > I know how to deal with svn version but we did too much changes to consider current trunk as "stable". That's why I just apply three svn revision to the latest stable release :) > The theory is that a user can get the upstream's tarball, apply Debian's > diff.gz patch and get a working package. The diff.gz contains everything > you have done. That user would be surprised if the diff.gz didn't work > with the upstream version you specify. > It's now done but I have a strange problem I didn't noticed before. The first time I build the package I get "missing target install-python-museek2.3". If I restart package building it works fine.
James is having a look, I hope he will understand what it is. Could you check the package too ? It's still available at mentors, same link than before. Thanks ! > Christoph > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
