On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Florent Rougon wrote: > Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why does this matter? I don't see every other package specifically > > mentioning who made it or what OS it was originally developed for. > > Of course it matters. I don't know whether there is an official (i.e., > from Apple) public full specification for HFS+, but I suspect it is not > the case. Which means that Apple developers are obviously in a better > position than most other people to write tools dealing with HFS+.
Hi, in case you are curious, hfsplus-1.0.4/doc/hfsp.html led me to Apple's Technical Note TN1150 [1], which is meant for <cite>programmers implementing HFS Plus support on other platforms</cite>. /* detailed and very interesting reading IMO */. Unfortunately, for example, the latest linux kernel fs/hfsplus/super.c reports that journaling, and probably some more features, are not supported yet. [1] http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn1150.html -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
