Don Armstrong schrieb am Sonntag, den 05. August 2007: Hi,
maybe I wasn't very politly, but I it was late after a hard weekend. I apologize for that. > > So I still consider this as crap. > > Why in the world are you even complaining about this? You're not the > maintainer of the package, and the NMU that was uploaded resolved the > problems correctly, even if it wasn't uploaded to DELAYED like it > should have been and $DEITY forbid, fixed some extra bugs as it went > by. Mostly because I still take care about the packages and the people I sponsor. It was a mistake to not subscribe to the PTS for this package. But I still thinks that most of my points were valid. This NMU was far away from just fixing one RC Bug. > > I'm just the sponsor and wasn't aware of this bug. First time I > > heard about the NMU was yesterday from the mentors system. I already > > ping the maintainer who was on holidays til this weekend. I would > > have reacted tomorrow. > > If you're the sponsor of the package, it is your responsibility to > monitor the packagaes which you sponsor, *especially* for RC bugs and > to fix them when the maintainer which you are sponsoring for cannot or > does not. > > If checking http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=formorer or > subscribing to the PTS for the packages you sponsor is too dificult, > then you should not be sponsoring them. > > For example, instead of responding with vitriol to this attempt to > improve the quality of debian packages, you should be contacting > Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and helping get #430933 resolved. This bug is only in experimental and is currently resolved upstream. Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
