Russ Allbery <[email protected]> writes: > Ben Finney <[email protected]> writes: > > Kumar Appaiah <[email protected]> writes: > > >> "Closing with a wontfix tag" is something which people do, but I > >> personally don't prefer. […]
> > What, then, should be the tag applied for “not a bug” or otherwise > > invalid reports? > > In Debian, the standard practice is to just close them. Some > maintainers tag them with wontfix before closing them, but the tags on > closed bugs are mostly ignored so it's not clear that this makes much > difference. I would guess (and in my case, I know) that the people who do this are using it for some standard indication of the “resolution” of the bug report. That is, answering the question “What was the state of the bug when this report was closed?” The usual case would be “fixed”, so that can be assumed in the absence of such information. But for reports closed *without* a “fix”, it would be good to indicate that, probably with standard tags. Do they exist? -- \ “Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without | `\ having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it | _o__) too?” —Douglas Adams | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
