On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:14:54 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I noticed that recently some people seem to seek first time sponsors > > while asking for setting the "DM-Upload-Allowed: yes" flag at the very > > same time. > > This isn't the only misuse of DMUA that exists, some people set it in > their package instead of asking the sponsor to set it.
It's our duty to check if DMUA is set or not. Never, EVER, review a package
only based on a changelog.
If I am unhappy with DMUA for a specific maintainer+package pair, I talk to the
maintainer, and tell her I can upload only without DMUA because I don't
believe she is ready for unattended uploads. If she agrees, I simply drop that
line from debian/control and upload the package -- otherwise she just goes and
looks for another sponsor.
If we all agree on being stricter about DMUA, she just won't get that flag, even
when asking someone else.
I don't see any flaw in the current process. Sponsors already take the burden of
many things when uploading a package (license issues and dfsg-freeness come to
mind), and checking DMUA is just one of them.
> Others go further and do not mention that in debian/changelog nor in their RFS
> mail.
One of those "sponsoring rules" I try to enforce to people asking for uploads
is: add a "DMUA set" in debian/changelog, and possibly something like "ACKed by
dapal".
Checking the changelog is, once again, still our duty -- people looking for
sponsors tipically are:
1) newbies -- and they don't know what to do, someone must instruct them
on best practices -- that's why we're also "mentors",
2) experienced packagers with no upload rights -- being experienced, just
tell a word and they'll understand.
So, there really is no flaw in the current process, IMO.
Kindly,
David
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
`. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
`- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
