On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 19:00:27 +1000 Matthew Palmer <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:18:20PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > > Why won't you just use `git --describe`? > > > > It produces nice version numbers of the format > > > > <last tag>-<number of commits after it>-<start of hash> > > > > (or just <last tag> when you're packaging a release) > > git --describe is, as far as I can tell, useless for the purpose stated at > the beginning of the thread. Did you miss the <number of commits after it> bit? I think that makes it ideal provided each release is tagged with its version number. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
