On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@debian.org> wrote:
> is the fact that the package uses dkms relevant for the end user? it
> seems as an implementation detail of the package to me, so I'd suggest
> to drop that suffix.

Not a good idea, seems like most (or all) DKMS packages current have
the -dkms suffix (virtualbox-ose-dkms, blcr-dkms, nvidia-kernel-dkms,
etc.).

Regards,


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=dcpeqmohz+uktahe1axw=v4f0s6ru+ah0u...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to