Reinhard Tartler <[email protected]> writes: > is the fact that the package uses dkms relevant for the end user? it > seems as an implementation detail of the package to me, so I'd suggest > to drop that suffix.
There are some things the user has to know to do to use a dkms package correctly (install the right kernel headers, ensure that they're always upgraded when the kernel is upgraded, etc.), so it may be helpful to have it be fairly obvious that the package is a DKMS package. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
