Thanks! I have corrected the watch file, and rewritten the copyright file to conform to DEP 5 policy.
Guido On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Vincent Cheng <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Guido van Steen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> To be honest, I had never heard of a "DEP-5 requirement". Therefore, >> my package does not contain debian/copyright file using DEP-5 either. >> >> So, should I also follow the specifications in >> "http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5";!? > > DEP-5 is not a requirement as per Policy, but many sponsors encourage > (or even demand) the use of DEP-5, and it seems to be gaining more and > more momentum in Debian. So I'd encourage you to use DEP-5 as I think > it improves the clarity and readability of debian/copyright, but > that's just my personal opinion, and my opinion doesn't really count > for all that much, given that I'm not a DD and I can't sponsor your > package. > > I've also taken a quick look at your fizsh package, and I've noticed > that your debian/watch is broken. Run "uscan --report-status" and > you'll see what I mean. It's pretty simple to fix though... > > --- a/debian/watch 2011-08-21 21:28:34.438237710 -0700 > +++ b/debian/watch 2011-08-21 21:24:49.000000000 -0700 > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ > version=3 > -http://sf.net/fizsh-([0-9]\.[0-9]\.[0-9]+)\.tar\.gz > +http://sf.net/fizsh/fizsh-([0-9]\.[0-9]\.[0-9]+)\.tar\.gz > > Other than that, your package seems to be fine. :) > > Kind regards, > - Vincent Cheng > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/camtvz+tncnpspjzgsodnobkugxugqhn9uhbmgvc-18gj_el...@mail.gmail.com
