Josue Abarca <[email protected]> writes: > Wences Arana and I intend to adopt planner, so now we are looking for > a sponsor for our package "planner". [...] > The package is lintian (pedantic) clean.
Fortunately for me, it's not algernon-clean just yet! docs ==== Why are you installing the AUTHORS file into the binary package? That's pretty much covered in debian/copyright anyway. Similarly, I find the README fairly useless too, as most of the information in it is already available in the debian package. It's only the NEWS file I'd keep, and a quick glance through it suggests that it's enough to put that into the planner package, -dev, -doc and -data don't really need a copy, I believe. debian/source/local-options =========================== Erm, this thing is, well, local. It's not in the package in any shape or form, so... why mention it in the changelog? (Or perhaps you want it as debian/source/options instead?) This is all for now. Other than this, the package looks fine after a quick glance, and unless I find anything more severe by the time this mail gets answered and I'm done testing the binaries, I'm willing to upload as-is. -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
