On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: >> I would suggest to use Section: vcs instead of utils. > > Changed as adviced.
You appear to have missed the one in the source package section of debian/control. Fix that one and delete the one from the binary package section since that causes a lintian complaint. >> The package description needs a review for grammar and spelling, >> please contact the debian-l10n-english list. > > Well, this is a very polite way to point out how badly I screwed up with > description. When I'm tired my English sometimes shuts down... :( > > I believe description is better now: Much better. A few more things to polish: There is no reason to have +git200808271242 in the upstream version number since you are packaging a tagged version. I would suggest using `git describe | sed s/git2cl-//` to get a useful version number. This works nicely even when you are packaging a non-tagged version. Please comment out DH_VERBOSE in debian/rules. Please add a debian/watch file explaining that upstream does not release tarballs and that the gitweb server used does not have the ability to export tarballs. How about running git2cl in the get-orig-source target to generate an upstream ChangeLog from the git history? :) -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6G1nhs-VvHk9x9zP-PPbyhaMgw9=nkya99vvadjxz_...@mail.gmail.com
