On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht <benoit.kne...@fsfe.org> wrote: > Sebastian H. wrote: >> > Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be >> > better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an >> > improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them >> > the choice. But maybe I'm missing something. >> >> The short answer is, it makes package maintenance much easier and >> is less error prone. > > I see the point of having one source package for all the tools, but you > could still make several binary packages from there (as alsa-tools does, > though not for every single utility I must admit).
What's the size of these packages? what's their dependencies? A quick look from here looks like they are qtgui apps that uses libasound ? /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnjef9f5.p7v.nos...@sshway.ssh.pusling.com
