"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[email protected]> writes: >> If you changed the package to address concerns, please send a follow-up >> to the sponsoring request (To: [email protected]) that includes the >> URL to the source package and the last changelog entries similar to the >> initial request. > > What would sponsoree do for the "follow-up" RFSes, i.e. new version of > the package is prepared and a sponsor is wanted again? Re-open the bug > or create new one?
Once a package has been uploaded, the request should only be reopened when the upload was rejected by the archive later (eg. manual reject from NEW, signature problems, ...). For new releases a new request should be filed instead. If the version number changes before an upload (for example when a new upstream version was released before the package was sponsored), the sponsoree should send a follow-up to the current request and retitle it to include the new version number. My reasoning is that issues should hopefully be addressed once a package has been uploaded and no longer apply to the next request, they only make the bug log longer. In contrast they might still apply when there was no upload. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
