* Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]>, 2012-01-19, 19:27:
I'm generally not a big fan to overuse the BTS for stuff it wasn't
really designed for. This tends to result in complex processes that are
difficult to follow for newcomers. For example, the wnpp bugs are often
misformed, or people don't follow the right process.
The big difference is that nobody reads the wnpp bug traffic. But
debian-mentors (or whatever the pseudo-package will be eventually
called) bug traffic will land on this mailing list. Malformed bug titles
will be promptly corrected, people don't following the process will be
educated. :)
* Integration into UDD bug search[2]
[2] <http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi>
It might be better to write a separate cgi for that, to add more
specific logic. For example, you could easily split the list with:
- new packages
- new uploads for existing packages
- packages already uploaded (RFS that should be closed)
- RFS that couldn't be parsed
Or we could write a bot that would usertag the bugs appropriately. Then
you could use normal BTS view rather than UDD.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
