On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Jerome BENOIT <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your reply:
You're quite welcome. > On 23/01/12 19:54, Samuel Bronson wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Jerome BENOIT<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Is there a better way to deal with this `Changes.xml' ? >>> I guess that I can add some stuff in the makefile to convert it in text >>> format: >>> do specific tools exist to convert this kind of changelog in text format >>> ? >> >> If I were you, I'd ask upstream about that > > I have just sent a couple of questions about it to the upstream maintainer. Good. >> , or (since a quick google >> shows that this is a TeX-related program) ask about it on >> <http://tex.stackexchange.com> (a Q&A site about TeX with loads of >> extremely helpful people on it). > > The Q&A are about [La]TeX. > BibTool is mainly a tool to manipulate BibTeX databases, > and as such it is not directly related to [La]TeX. Eh, they aren't terribly picky: any part of a TeX system is considered fair game there, including just about everything on CTAN. The worst that is likely to happen is that nobody will answer; they aren't likely to close it as off-topic. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cajyzjmd_+-jtiqcs+6t4ogb5_wy3c07p2mokzvqbdznyvzu...@mail.gmail.com
