Jerome BENOIT <[email protected]> writes:
>>> Is there a better way to deal with this `Changes.xml' ?
>>> I guess that I can add some stuff in the makefile to convert it in text
>>> format:
>>> do specific tools exist to convert this kind of changelog in text format ?
>>
>> If I were you, I'd ask upstream about that
>
> I have just sent a couple of questions about it to the upstream maintainer.

If the upstream maintainer is slow to reply, you could always write some
simple xsl to convert this to a text changelog format. I've just scanned
through the file and it looks simple enough... Not sure if this is "too
hands on" for what a packager should be doing though.

Also, presumably upstream has some xsl tools for parsing this, otherwise
they wouldn't be forcing themselves to write so many angle brackets! :-)

Rupert

Attachment: pgp18KxK4BEsc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to