Gergely Nagy <[email protected]> writes: > If it is obfuscated, then it is most probably not the preferred form of > modification (and not the real source, but something derived from that), > thus, them being GPL'd is invalid, and it's not even fit for non-free, > as far as I see.
This is something I have to discuss with the upstream author (who also sells the unobfuscated version). He probably would then make a specific license which would allow its distribution, but he is not willing to put the original source code under GPL. Best Ole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
