[email protected] (Olе Streicher) writes: > Björn Esser <[email protected]> writes: >> So I'd suggest name the free one slalib and the other one >> slalib-nonfree or vice versa (like the unrar example). > > The problem is that I want the dependent programs to be linked against > any of them. > > For example "saods9" would use slalib as a shared library, and I want to > git the user a choide to run it either with the free, or with the > non-free version.
Are the two libraries actually ABI compatible? Somehow I doubt that, but I might just be too sceptic when it comes to non-free software. -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
