On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Cameron Hart wrote: > This is probably more for the benefit of Windows and Mac, The current > Premake Debian package links against the installed version of Lua > rather than building the embedded version.
Ick. Its a bit sad that folks have to reinvent packages and repositories poorly for the sake of those platforms. > This sounds like the easiest way to proceed to me. Should I open a new > ITP bug for Premake4 or rename the current Premake ITA bug? Should I > make any changes to the existing Premake, there are a few bugs logged > against it although most should be addressed by creating a Premake4 > source. Also should I base a Premake4 source off of the Premake source > package (e.g. keep the Debian changelog etc.) or start afresh. If you want to maintain both premake 3 and premake4 for a period of time then file a new ITP. If you want to maintain just premake4 then retitle the ITA to ITP: premake4... Personally I would just leave premake orphaned and remove it after the wheezy release, so option 2. Personally I would base premake4 off the premake source package. Just rename stuff as needed. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caktje6gypo5kpef0vdur2bo6zpvgedtf3fj-0epc3hasqge...@mail.gmail.com