Dariusz Dwornikowski <[email protected]> wrote: > I am working on a MaraDNS package, the upstream Author, Sam Trenholme > suggested that maybe it could also worth packaging ndjbdns, a djbdns > fork but with GPL licence and all bugs fixed. Also the upstream of > ndjbdns is quite responsive and active. [...]
Hello, from a users point of view I would love to see a tiny performing DNS cache in Debian which is maintained upstream. However judging from the respective descriptions on the web I guess that deadwood should work as well as a djbdns fork. OTOH I wonder what would keep you as maintainer interested in taking care of two different packages doing basically the same job. You will soon find out that you like one better and will only use this one. You might then have a hard time motivating yourself to invest time in the other one. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
